|
Hot News Item |
Link, if any
known to us, to source |
burdlaw comments |
| Teleflex v KSR |
http://www.supremecourtus.gov/docket/04-1350.htm
http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2006/10/ksr_v_teleflex_.html |
The major patent case of
this decade on the issue of the proper standard for "obviousness"
determinations is to be decided this term |
| Patent
filing fees split into component parts, such as base filing fee, search fee,
examination fee, and publication fee, |
http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/ac/qs/ope/fee2006may15.htm |
Current fees went into
effect May 15, 2006 |
| Electronic Patent
Filing is Here and Now Uses PDF, making Filing
Much Easier |
http://www.uspto.gov/ebc/efs/index.html
|
This is a major improvement, which should simplify
electronic patent filing and make it more widely used. Long gone is
the horrendous PASAT xml authoring tool that made e-filing patents
frustrating. |
| PTO Announces new Reexam
policy - will only reexamine requested claims |
http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/dapp/opla/preognotice/reex_cls_requested.pdf |
For defense attorneys, you
can now attack a patent piecemeal, claim by claim using prior decisions to
fine tune your arguments for each subsequent filing. |
| CAFC attempts to
preempt Supreme Court on obviousness |
http://fedcir.gov/opinions/06-1088.pdf |
The Dystar case, where
Judge Michel goes to great length to explain that the CAFC "suggestion to
combine" rule can be met by implication as well as
specific teaching |
| CAFC holds that
Government sponsored overseas infringement of method is not a 5th amendment
taking |
Zolteck v US |
This seems a major
injustice and unfair decision and is now under review by the US Supreme
Court. We expect it to be reversed. |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|